Everyone can agree that good teams/players overperform vs xG and bad teams/players underperform.
When an average probability is assigned it takes no account of player quality or opposition quality.
Simple example.
Borja is given 0.15 for a chance.
Might be closer to correct for an average champs player....but he isn't.
So the real value of the chance (for Borja) might be 0.25 or better.
That's why better teams/players consistently outperform xG.....
Because the xG values assigned to better players are WRONG....
Posted By: usacanary, Nov 27, 13:40:24
Written & Designed By Ben Graves 1999-2025