Thing is, we all know all the rational arguments, for and against

Farke couldn't organise a defence, his record in the prem, blah de blah de blah .... but, when it comes down to it, I still think Webber basically lost it when he sacked him - and I think the source of the tension between them, whether or not articulated, was to do with recruitment, and who was/would be to blame for the unfolding problems. Webber thought he knew best, but it turns out, in one very significant respect, he didn't. Essentially, Farke's views of the players bought (reflected in the teams he chose) have been vindicated. At this point, Webber needs to take responsibility.

Posted By: paulg, May 9, 09:20:05