in some cases (of ownership) the distinction is a fine one

which is how we go from Abramovic being acceptable - apparently - for years (despite Salisbury, Crimea, Syria God knows what) - to sudden moral outrage. It's not as if Putin changed overnight. So some might look at their own clubs and wonder how far exactly they have travelled down that path, and where the distinction lies - how bad does an owner have to be? A few deaths ok? As long as quietly done?

Posted By: paulg, Feb 28, 09:15:09