Anyway...I loved Farke's football vision, which Deano lacks

But in terms of getting results at this level out of any squad Norwich City are likely to be able to afford in the next decade or two, Deano is clearly the better manager: pragmatism, use of subs, tactical changes in response to what the opposition is doing, much tighter at the back and individual players benefitting from a change in coaching - which is not to say there was anything wrong with the coacing under DF but sometimes changing coaches helps just from the change.

Maybe Daniel was the world as it should be and Deano is the world as it is, or something, idk, not enough coffee, or maybe too much.

Sundays. Gah.

Posted By: Old Man, Feb 6, 11:17:44