your last paragraph in your 1st post is pure bulls**t spin, Jim.

" (possibly protected under the Official Secrets Act?)"

holy f**king s**t!

from what i've read elsewhere,Corbyn might be guilty of over-reaching in his interpretaton of how far the documents show the Tories are willing to go for a Merkin deal - but that's nothing compared to your wish that Corbyn be hounded out of the election campaign on a charge of treason.

by all means point out that Corbyn's case is weak (with quoted evidence), but the rest of your claims?

it's pathetic.

Posted By: Ralf Scrampton, Nov 27, 15:01:09