exactly, its more political ethics and what we think is acceptable as a society

that website isn't a million miles away from the stunt they pulled re the fact checking, so it's interesting to see where people draw the line (or don't)

Particularly given how every time you push the boundaries, you normalise what was done before. Someone on here (?) joked the other day that their strategy seemed to be 'don't look at this foul thing we want to do, look at these even fouler things we might do!' and suddenly the foul thing doesn't look so bad and passes into general acceptance/falls off the radar. In many ways it's a decent tactic.

Back to the manifesto page, I find mildly amusing that, given they are being accused of using Trump tactics, they have found a way of doing something that would actually be illegal in the US (cybersquatting).

Posted By: CWC, Nov 21, 14:37:14