To me slagging off Delias and Michael statement only goes to show...

How irrational some of the "worthy outers" are. You may be surprised that I am actually border line on whether worthy should go or not but there are ways of showing your disapproval and ways not to. If anyone doubts the geniune loyality and commitement to the club of Delia and Michael to the club then I really think that shows a strange bias. They have released a well reasoned and rationally argued viewpoint that I seems geniunely heart felt. You may dissagree with some of their conclusions but you can't surely doubt their intentions - they honestly feel they are doing whats best for the club in the long term - and I personally hope and feel that they are right. What I can not agree with is statements suggesting that Delia is blaiming the fans - that is totally radiculous. The only negative reference she makes is that protests within the ground does not help the players - surely that is quite indisputable - whether it's justified due to the players form is a different question but it just has to have a negative effect on the players. So when people do start to slag of Delia for making rational statements then it shows an either complete lack of understanding or a complete bias against the club - It seems certain people are determined the to take whatever anyone says at the club and make it negative. The club can do no right at the minute it seems - anything it says it's slated for - If it's quiet you slate it for not listening if it responds in what is surely a rational and polite manner it's slated as well. I can accept much critism of worthys signings and tatics this year - it hasn't been good anyone can see that - but to start hurling abuse at Delia and the rest of the board just shows your shows the lack of consideration that some of you have actually given to the whole "worthy out" movement. It makes me doubt your intentions not the boards

Posted By: greendude, Mar 8, 18:39:00