Sorry, I still don't understand really

You said Tottenham's new stadium was a good argument against the need for standing in a stadium to create an atmosphere.

I said there were thousands of people actually standing anyway - with the inference that it's probably not really a good argument as a result.

You then used a lack of accurate counting of fans as a retort - rather than addressing my point. All fair enough, it's your choice. But I don't understand your point of bringing up me suggesting a rough figure, which in my opinion isn't really relevant when it's clear there were thousands standing. Which is why I asked.

Posted By: Yellalee, Apr 9, 22:42:00