Judge for yourself...

User Posted Link

She seems to have very strong views for someone who's "undecided" in all of this. Her beef is with people on here shooting down those that have an opposing/contoversial/unpopular POV. Wants reasoned debate, and that the glib comments are 'unnecessary' and 'stifle debate'. So whilst occupying the middle-ground, does she have to be sanctimonious and patronising (and shoot down in flames) those that are on the whole putting forward a reasoned, valued argument, based on evidence and fact?

That above all, I would say, stifle's debate and is unnecessary.

Posted By: Jim Nasium, Mar 2, 13:03:43