sorry if ww2 but...

did anybody read Waghorn's piece in the EEN today about Cyber journos? This arsehole needs to realise that the people at the game were real and weren't watching a virtual match. It was real and it was s**te. He really is an apologist for the regime; the sort of tosser who, in the USSR before the collapse of the Berlin Wall would havew been wheeled out to defend the indefensible.

I say to Waghorn this. Give us an insightful piece on Worthless's signiongs this season. Justify the money spent on Hughes, Etuhu, Robinson and the waste of Bosman type signings such as Jarrett, Thorne, Louis Jean along with the fetish for loan signings, which even I think can be positive but not to the extent that Worthless has used them. Give us some context on Delia and Michael's thinking on keeping this w**ker.

Yesterday, I just couldn't believe the lack of interest, performance, passion or direction of the team that Worthless has built. I remember a time when my Union was being criticised for a poor pay settlement. They were hailed with the slogan " supine capitulators". In their case, at the time, I thought that they were being harshly treated by the membership. Now, I think the term "supine capitulators" applied to Worthless and the band of mercenary toerags that went out there purpoting to represent the people of Norwich and Norfolk would be a mild criticism. Waghorn should accept this as fact and look to Steve Gedge, in is own paper and not on Cyberspace, to explain to him what a bunch of tossers this management team really is. Ofr even virtually, if he prefers.

PS. Waghorn, do you still think Dickson Whothef**k is improving with every game?

Posted By: Jambocanary, Feb 6, 18:53:56