Agree entirely - they *should* have made the tickets cheaper

£15-20 would have been absolutely fine.

On this basis though, I just didn't think that £25 was that bad (upper end definitely) and, as Jim says, the low attendance wasn't just about price.

Actually it would have been fascinating to see what the crowd would have been if we'd charged £20.

I have a feeling it still would have been under, say 16,000.

Posted By: norway, Jan 10, 16:26:13