I cannot see this situation improving, just because it rarely does in football, but just wondering how people feel it compares to Worthington. With him I thought the decision to get rid of him was more obvious and went on for much longer. The serious calls for Neil to go have only really been very recent.
In other words, are we nowhere near him being sacked because they do have a track record of letting things go on for way too long (at least a year I would say in Worthington's case)? Or maybe he is under more pressure because of the money he has spent and the 'quality' of the squad?
Posted By: ede, Nov 27, 14:00:20
Written & Designed By Ben Graves 1999-2024