I have some shares ...

Couldn't attend with commitments etc.

If you don't know the answer you are welcome to ignore. Quite frankly there's no need to be a prick about it ?!

Before last night I haven't seen it reported anywhere that the chairman was fulfilling CEO duties. That surely can't be best practice in any business. The fact give supporters weren't told appears a little shady and IMO shows things are a little too cosy at boardroom level.

Posted By: loz, Nov 24, 15:42:42