No

Reductio ad absurdum

Let me spell it out for you yet again

Proposition one: it turns out Ched was wrongfully convicted. Fresh evidence has convinced a jury of that. He has, therefore, been the victim of a miscarriage of justice. If you continue to dispute that then you obviously have a strange lexicon.

Proposition two: this is going to become a famous case. Sadly. In fact it already is.

Do the maths.

Posted By: Old Git, Oct 14, 16:34:18