Zinging is a technical term I'm not familiar with

There was new evidence in both cases, sufficient in her case to convince the Court of Appeal (nb - not a jury) that the conviction was unsafe, and in Ched's case first to convince the CA to allow a retrial, and second to convince a jury he wasn't guilty

I see you have no answer to the question of whether a man who had done years in prison for something new evidence has shown him not to have done can possibly be said not to have been the victim of a miscarriage of justice

And sadly it will be famous

Posted By: Old Git, Oct 14, 16:31:27