The argument there in football is

The things that are deemed to be unfair in football are open to interpretation, ie Terry's blatent handball against Fulham can still fine tooth combed by an official because the handball rule says you have to be sure they handle it on purpose

The tackle on Ronaldo for me wasn't good, and he was right to be angry, but in the interpretation of the game, it's up to the official to decide how bad it was, and because Jordan played the ball, he decided to play on

Those are the things that anger managers and fans, but are the things that aren't stonewall solid decisions

Grabbing the corner flag and chucking after scoring, or leaving the field of play, ie going past the advertising things, are straight forward breaches of rules

Which is why football riles people, but in reality a lot of the time, the ref is acted on a straight forward offence, and interpreting another

Posted By: pants, Jan 16, 10:18:31