Are you serious?

Holland had way more attacking possession after half-time. Both teams were very well set up defensively though and thus chances were at a premium. Your interpretation that Argentina were knocking on the door all night is just wrong. Trying to argue that the more adventurous team deservedly went through just highlights your prejudice and makes your ridiculous notion that this Holland team (not the 2010 team), which is a lowly 12th in the table of dirtiest teams in this tournament, is somehow 'anti-football' even more ludicrous. Consistently through the tournament you have tried to argue the same thing, and as far as I can tell, not a single poster has agreed with you. Doesn't that tell you something?

Posted By: King, Jul 10, 04:41:59