No he didn't the team selections were laughable

He got the tactics so badly wrong against Liverpool that it gifted them a two goal league, man united omg, and no strikers on the pitch in a game where we had to score against chelsea.
It was definitely not justified in giving him the job, everybody I've spoken to tonight city fan or not thinks its a joke and they're right. He shouldn't have gone for the job, I'd have had more respect for him if he hadn't This years payments mean that we have the best squeak at getting out first time, and the board have gambled it on a man with ZERO wins in charge of the first team. I'd have preferred anybody instead of him.
This really has been unacceptable. What the f**k were the board thinking. I've never known any appointment cause as much resentment towards the board as this one, it seems like one cock up after another

Posted By: Mickdundee, May 22, 22:02:03