All this slagging off of McNally....

My understanding of things was there was a vote on whether to keep Hughton at least once earlier in the season and it was a tied vote (3-3) due to the absence of one of the directors. Do we really think, given his comments about Hughton over the course of the season, and his history in football, McNally was one of the three who voted to keep him?

The blame lays elsewhere in my opinion.

Posted By: avid_canary, May 7, 20:38:17