Lansbury has a better range of passing than. . .
Fox, Surman, and bennett, Is more versatile than them 3, Has more pace than all but Bennett out of that list, And is a game changer with that extra something special in the locker. . . Of which only Hoolahan, Snoddy, and maybe pilks are. . . . .
In short I'd rather Lansbury than Butterfield!
Posted By: Alan, Sep 3, 16:11:21
Follow Ups
- 2E. Bennett is an all round better player than Lansbury
Posted By: Brom, Sep 3, 16:33:58 - 2Even when fit Lansbury struggled to get into
Posted By: duke of york, Sep 3, 16:21:11 - 42"rather Lansbury than Butterfield" - based on what???
Posted By: RootunTootunHootun, Sep 3, 16:14:21 - 4What have you seen of Butterfield to make you think this?....
Posted By: Vivid Data Shark, Sep 3, 16:13:59 - So you'd rather a player that nobody wants to take in the Prem over one you haven't seen
Posted By: Yellalee, Sep 3, 16:13:13
Reply to Message
Written & Designed By Ben Graves 1999-2025