a contract can only ever include what both parties agree to

I can't see why Lambert would ever have agreed to such a thing.

I presume we initially played it safe with a rolling contract in case it went sour and we needed to pay him off cheaply (that or Lambert has never wanted to commit to us) and since then Lambert has held all the cards in terms of any contract extension: we needed him more than he needed us.

Posted By: CWC, Jun 3, 11:02:51