We're f**ked
Posted By: pants on January 14th 2009 at 19:39:06
Message Thread
- anyone want boothroyd? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 14, 19:34:43
- Why? (NCFC) - Chester Drawers, Jan 14, 19:48:18
- Thought anyone would be better than Roeder? (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Jan 14, 19:38:05
- nearly everyone yes (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 14, 19:39:22
- We're fucked (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 14, 19:39:06
- Yay! ^^^This is the new *SUPER GLENN ROEDER* ^^^ (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jan 14, 19:40:42
- Which, in turn, was the new SUPER PETER GRANT (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 14, 19:42:48
- so sacking roeder was a bad idea? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 14, 19:40:18
- too early (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 14, 19:46:23
- like when grant went? (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 14, 19:48:34
- Which may prove preferable to 'too late' (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 14, 19:48:23
- That's the terrible thing (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Jan 14, 19:45:21
- we don't have the players to need a great manager (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 14, 19:48:08
- agreed...it might help if we get a manager in (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jan 14, 19:52:44
- That sounds about right (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Jan 14, 19:52:39
- we don't have the players to need a great manager (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 14, 19:48:08
- too early (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 14, 19:46:23
- Yay! ^^^This is the new *SUPER GLENN ROEDER* ^^^ (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jan 14, 19:40:42
- no but obviously he would get my support until (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jan 14, 19:37:04
- Yes but he will have to work with the players that are here so he will have to change.. (n/m) (NCFC) - colincanary, Jan 14, 19:41:50
- lol (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 14, 19:37:32
- NO TO HOOOOOOF! (n/m) (NCFC) - Thomo, Jan 14, 19:36:58
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.