We had our best spell of the game with that change though, they shat themselves with bell
and hoolahan was excellent up front
I agree with what you're trying to say. As all we lack, is the same old story, we lack a big striker which allows the quality we do play to have an end product
I don't think Roeder got that tactically wrong though, as we had them on the rack for the rest of the game
Posted By: pants on January 10th 2009 at 21:36:32
Message Thread
- my thoughts on today (NCFC) - ingi, Jan 10, 21:11:04
- We had our best spell of the game with that change though, they shat themselves with bell (NCFC) - pants, Jan 10, 21:36:32
- Does that mean we get 'end of season bonus, on the rack points?' (n/m) (NCFC) - harry boulders, Jan 10, 21:39:39
- what i do know is (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 10, 21:41:41
- woodwork points. (n/m) (NCFC) - harry boulders, Jan 10, 21:42:53
- shit defending and conceded penalty points (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 10, 21:45:01
- woodwork points. (n/m) (NCFC) - harry boulders, Jan 10, 21:42:53
- what i do know is (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 10, 21:41:41
- what were the pies like? (n/m) (NCFC) - Tombs, Jan 10, 21:38:00
- Does that mean we get 'end of season bonus, on the rack points?' (n/m) (NCFC) - harry boulders, Jan 10, 21:39:39
- Cort? (n/m) (NCFC) - Tombs, Jan 10, 21:13:22
- We had our best spell of the game with that change though, they shat themselves with bell (NCFC) - pants, Jan 10, 21:36:32
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.