Annoying comment of the day....
"anyone would be better than Roeder"
Anyone? Really? Grant? Hamilton? That is only two who have had the job, plenty more out there who would be worse.
You could go with Roeder is not up to the job and there are better candidates, which makes more sense.
Posted By: big dick sanchez on January 10th 2009 at 21:35:50
Message Thread
- Annoying comment of the day.... (NCFC) - big dick sanchez, Jan 10, 21:35:50
- "anyone would be better than Roeder" (NCFC) - The year of the twat, Jan 10, 21:48:34
- so the fact that you can name people (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 10, 21:54:38
- Well you and I actually don't really know (NCFC) - The year of the twat, Jan 10, 21:59:31
- Exactly, everything is relative. (NCFC) - usacanary, Jan 10, 22:17:42
- Barnsley got Cureton (n/m) (NCFC) - harry boulders, Jan 10, 21:58:17
- Well you and I actually don't really know (NCFC) - The year of the twat, Jan 10, 21:59:31
- so the fact that you can name people (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 10, 21:54:38
- why would we reappoint either? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 10, 21:40:01
- many on your"list" had the same experience as Peter Grant (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Jan 10, 21:49:19
- so what? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 10, 21:51:33
- that makes sense............ (NCFC) - usacanary, Jan 10, 21:54:51
- I think we need to get out of this cycle of sacking the manager every 18 months or less (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Jan 10, 21:59:35
- I don't know why but roeder just doesn't seem to be able to get this squad to click (NCFC) - strap_on sally, Jan 10, 22:06:19
- Yes we do need to get out of that cycle. Just (NCFC) - BillySteele, Jan 10, 22:02:36
- Roeder may well turn out to be that one. He hasn't had a full season here yet (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Jan 10, 22:05:19
- That'll be too late. (n/m) (NCFC) - BillySteele, Jan 10, 22:08:29
- and when he has a full season (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 10, 22:08:17
- Doesn't mean it will necessarily happen here (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Jan 10, 22:10:51
- well he's giving it a fucking good go (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 10, 22:11:35
- I'm convinced he isn't trying to get us relegated. (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Jan 10, 22:13:16
- well indeed (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 10, 22:14:32
- I'm convinced he isn't trying to get us relegated. (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Jan 10, 22:13:16
- well he's giving it a fucking good go (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 10, 22:11:35
- Doesn't mean it will necessarily happen here (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Jan 10, 22:10:51
- Roeder may well turn out to be that one. He hasn't had a full season here yet (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Jan 10, 22:05:19
- if we appointed someone who wasn't incompetent (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 10, 22:00:50
- He was competent enough to do a v good job in keeping us up last season (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Jan 10, 22:02:57
- so what? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 10, 22:05:49
- So what? I was just pointimg out that you were wrong in calling him incompetent (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Jan 10, 22:07:51
- well why was he in the guardian list (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 10, 22:11:08
- Use your own judgement. Was he incompetent last season when he kept us up? (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Jan 10, 22:12:44
- from leicester onwards yes (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 10, 22:16:11
- So that's a "no" then. Although you seem to have great difficulty in admitting it. (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Jan 10, 22:18:20
- it's a yes (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 10, 22:19:35
- So that's a "no" then. Although you seem to have great difficulty in admitting it. (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Jan 10, 22:18:20
- from leicester onwards yes (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 10, 22:16:11
- Use your own judgement. Was he incompetent last season when he kept us up? (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Jan 10, 22:12:44
- well why was he in the guardian list (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 10, 22:11:08
- So what? I was just pointimg out that you were wrong in calling him incompetent (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Jan 10, 22:07:51
- so what? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 10, 22:05:49
- He was competent enough to do a v good job in keeping us up last season (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Jan 10, 22:02:57
- a good chance? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 10, 21:57:05
- first time managers............... (NCFC) - usacanary, Jan 10, 21:59:00
- it doesn't have to be a first timer (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 10, 22:00:00
- darren ferguson, got to be worth a shout (NCFC) - strap_on sally, Jan 10, 22:03:11
- Wegner ..... worth a shout. (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Jan 10, 22:06:34
- wegner who? (n/m) (NCFC) - strap_on sally, Jan 10, 22:14:47
- Wegner ..... worth a shout. (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Jan 10, 22:06:34
- darren ferguson, got to be worth a shout (NCFC) - strap_on sally, Jan 10, 22:03:11
- it doesn't have to be a first timer (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 10, 22:00:00
- And you Have Faith in this Board (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Jan 10, 21:58:56
- well they managed it once (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 10, 21:59:31
- first time managers............... (NCFC) - usacanary, Jan 10, 21:59:00
- I think we need to get out of this cycle of sacking the manager every 18 months or less (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Jan 10, 21:59:35
- that makes sense............ (NCFC) - usacanary, Jan 10, 21:54:51
- so what? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 10, 21:51:33
- Did you miss the bit where I said plenty others would be worse (NCFC) - big dick sanchez, Jan 10, 21:47:37
- people could be worse (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 10, 21:52:50
- Agreed, even if do support Roeder (NCFC) - big dick sanchez, Jan 10, 21:58:54
- if it cost nothing to change managers...... (NCFC) - usacanary, Jan 10, 21:56:56
- It does cost nothing to replace managers (NCFC) - The year of the twat, Jan 10, 22:03:47
- so you'd be ok with roeder resigning (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 10, 21:57:55
- Of course I have no problem if he resigns. (NCFC) - usacanary, Jan 10, 22:05:22
- but worthington also couldn't take us forward (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 10, 22:07:27
- Worthy was forced out long after he should have resigned (NCFC) - usacanary, Jan 10, 22:54:47
- but worthington also couldn't take us forward (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 10, 22:07:27
- Of course I have no problem if he resigns. (NCFC) - usacanary, Jan 10, 22:05:22
- people could be worse (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 10, 21:52:50
- The Shake and Vac woman (n/m) (NCFC) - harry boulders, Jan 10, 21:42:03
- many on your"list" had the same experience as Peter Grant (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Jan 10, 21:49:19
- "anyone would be better than Roeder" (NCFC) - The year of the twat, Jan 10, 21:48:34
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.