if Bell and Clingan are so good why are we in this

position? If they are good then at best it suggests the current manager isn't good enough to get the best from them.

Posted By: Chopper on January 10th 2009 at 19:50:18

Message Thread

does this sum up the pro and cons of keeping roeder (NCFC) - conkers, Jan 10, 19:40:14
- if Bell and Clingan are so good why are we in this (NCFC) - Chopper, Jan 10, 19:50:18
  - Because (NCFC) - The year of the twat, Jan 10, 19:52:23
  - i think that's unfair (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 10, 19:51:38
    - Holy shit some balance...................... (NCFC) - usacanary, Jan 10, 19:53:54
      - lol (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 10, 19:55:45
        
        No, all 4 games are fairly lined but play................ (NCFC) - usacanary, Jan 10, 20:00:20
  - they are good players. we just dont have a team of them (n/m) (NCFC) - conkers, Jan 10, 19:51:10
    - exactly, few do in the champs. (NCFC) - usacanary, Jan 10, 19:57:51
- Very reasonable. (NCFC) - usacanary, Jan 10, 19:46:40
  - sounds like the injury today was more of a benefit than anything else (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Jan 10, 19:47:41
    - I dont disagree with that. (NCFC) - usacanary, Jan 10, 19:50:35
- an extra con (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 10, 19:42:26
  - you two would get on well together. (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Jan 10, 19:47:46
    - i really don't think we would (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 10, 19:49:06
    - i know he wants to bum me.... (n/m) (NCFC) - conkers, Jan 10, 19:48:54
  - i knew i could rely on you for a con scc! (n/m) (NCFC) - conkers, Jan 10, 19:43:30
    - seemed such a shocking ommission (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 10, 19:43:58
      - i was being polite "poor man management skills..." covered it but not as poetically (n/m) (NCFC) - conkers, Jan 10, 19:45:34

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.