Grounds is the nice one

Bates is the nasty one boo boo boo. We are happy to have Grounds back but wouldn't be happy with Bates. Royal we. And talking of Royals it was Pearce.

Posted By: camcan on January 7th 2009 at 09:46:30

Message Thread

The Grounds signing? Does it count as new loan? (NCFC) - Superstar D J, Jan 7, 09:09:32
- Emergency. Emergency. (NCFC) - Jim Nasium, Jan 7, 09:14:49
  - which one was he (NCFC) - south, Jan 7, 09:26:44
    - Defender... played about half a dozen games for us last year... (NCFC) - Jim Nasium, Jan 7, 09:29:55
      - i am getting him and Bates confused - (NCFC) - south, Jan 7, 09:32:11
        
        Bates was the one with a photoshopped nob (n/m) (NCFC) - harry boulders, Jan 7, 10:13:55
        
        I only recall Grounds playing three games for us (NCFC) - KentonCanary, Jan 7, 09:48:18
        
        he's called Grounds (NCFC) - camcan, Jan 7, 09:52:12
        
        Grounds is the nice one (NCFC) - camcan, Jan 7, 09:46:30
        
        Agreed... (NCFC) - Jim Nasium, Jan 7, 09:36:04
        
        ha ha (n/m) (NCFC) - shoddy, Jan 7, 09:38:28
        
        Grounds was this season, the other two were last I beleive (n/m) (NCFC) - Brom, Jan 7, 09:34:06
  - Yeah I wondered that as well. (NCFC) - Superstar D J, Jan 7, 09:17:38
    - We couldn't field a team! (n/m) (NCFC) - shoddy, Jan 7, 09:21:45
      - Yeah, but we would not have got ourselves in this sorry state.... (NCFC) - Superstar D J, Jan 7, 09:23:50
        
        That's right (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Jan 7, 09:30:17

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.