I know it probably shouldnt
but after reading that, it's made me think that Roeder is even more of a cockend.
I reckon even now Hucks would get in our first 11.
But like the great man himself says, its all water under the bridge now. Still angers me how it was all handled and the blame for that, lays with Roeder imo.
Posted By: HoofinHughes on January 5th 2009 at 12:31:09
Message Thread
- Another nail in Roeders coffin, Hucks interview from EDP... (NCFC) - DemoniCanary, Jan 5, 11:47:32
- quality (NCFC) - ingi, Jan 5, 12:38:28
- I know it probably shouldnt (NCFC) - HoofinHughes, Jan 5, 12:31:09
- Hucks doesn't play for us anymore? (n/m) (NCFC) - shoddy, Jan 5, 12:24:39
- Don't really see how that's any kind of nail in anything, to be honest. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jan 5, 11:55:46
- just shows what a dick roder is (n/m) (NCFC) - Muz, Jan 5, 12:52:39
- What I mean is that from the looks of it the EDP's against him now (n/m) (NCFC) - DemoniCanary, Jan 5, 11:59:03
- Because it riles up the fans a bit more? (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 5, 11:58:32
- Most of our points last season came when he wasn't in the team (NCFC) - pants, Jan 5, 12:16:46
- he was injured for most of it...we're not exactly flying high without him (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jan 5, 12:23:47
- We weren't flying high when he was here last season either (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 5, 12:26:32
- he was injured for most of it (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jan 5, 12:27:22
- until the end when he came back strong (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 5, 12:29:15
- Was our best player in the final few games when he'd got over his niggling injuries. (n/m) (NCFC) - HoofinHughes, Jan 5, 12:32:37
- he made little impact the last three seasons he was with us though (NCFC) - malkybarkid, Jan 5, 12:35:26
- Anyone who can fit four season into the last three seasons must be signed! (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 5, 12:38:20
- Easy - osmosis (n/m) (NCFC) - malkybarkid, Jan 5, 12:46:05
- Anyone who can fit four season into the last three seasons must be signed! (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 5, 12:38:20
- Yet in the last 10 games we got 9 points? (NCFC) - pants, Jan 5, 12:35:09
- a bit shocking really...who would keep a manager with such an horrific record? (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jan 5, 12:37:51
- big improvement then? (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 5, 12:36:58
- The same innit. Which is my point. I'm obviously a troll though (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 5, 12:37:54
- I see (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 5, 12:39:21
- The facts speak for themselves (NCFC) - pants, Jan 5, 12:42:08
- Facts don't if isolated (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 5, 12:43:24
- Who is the guy with the big bass drum ? (n/m) (NCFC) - Snakey, Jan 5, 13:17:31
- Facts don't if isolated (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 5, 12:43:24
- The facts speak for themselves (NCFC) - pants, Jan 5, 12:42:08
- I see (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 5, 12:39:21
- The same innit. Which is my point. I'm obviously a troll though (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 5, 12:37:54
- he made little impact the last three seasons he was with us though (NCFC) - malkybarkid, Jan 5, 12:35:26
- Was our best player in the final few games when he'd got over his niggling injuries. (n/m) (NCFC) - HoofinHughes, Jan 5, 12:32:37
- until the end when he came back strong (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 5, 12:29:15
- he was injured for most of it (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jan 5, 12:27:22
- did you go on Saturday? (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 5, 12:25:25
- Can't see myself going again (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jan 5, 12:29:03
- We weren't flying high when he was here last season either (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 5, 12:26:32
- To back that up do you have an analysis f average points per game when he (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 5, 12:23:30
- it's just based on the 1 game pants saw last season (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jan 5, 12:31:13
- wasn't he injured for much of the season? (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 5, 12:21:15
- you're right (NCFC) - camcan, Jan 5, 12:20:36
- he made little impact the last three seasons he was with us though (NCFC) - malkybarkid, Jan 5, 12:31:25
- debatable if you can call that little impact really... (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jan 5, 12:37:17
- whoooooooooooosh (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 5, 12:38:36
- lol (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 5, 12:41:31
- how is that a lol? Unless you are laughing at SiH getting the whoosh wrong (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jan 5, 12:44:09
- dint (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 5, 13:01:57
- Chill out man (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 5, 12:49:30
- Jeez it was just a question. (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jan 5, 12:54:14
- ok, I got the whooosh wrong too (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 5, 12:59:19
- Jeez it was just a question. (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jan 5, 12:54:14
- how is that a lol? Unless you are laughing at SiH getting the whoosh wrong (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jan 5, 12:44:09
- I'm pretty sure MBK was in support of Hucks leaving (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jan 5, 12:40:17
- So was I, sort of. (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 5, 12:42:55
- as was i, sort of, eventually, after I'd blubbed a bit. (NCFC) - megson, Jan 5, 12:51:00
- So was I, sort of. (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 5, 12:42:55
- lol (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 5, 12:41:31
- whoooooooooooosh (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 5, 12:38:36
- statto (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 5, 12:32:36
- and that's 4 anyway (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 5, 12:33:08
- I know. (NCFC) - malkybarkid, Jan 5, 12:34:06
- but how does that compare with the other players (NCFC) - camcan, Jan 5, 12:37:06
- Of course they are. It's the rose-tinted remembrance that annoys me. For the last two (NCFC) - malkybarkid, Jan 5, 12:41:36
- top 6 in the bottom half probably, but that would still be welcome (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 5, 12:36:02
- but how does that compare with the other players (NCFC) - camcan, Jan 5, 12:37:06
- I know. (NCFC) - malkybarkid, Jan 5, 12:34:06
- and that's 4 anyway (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 5, 12:33:08
- debatable if you can call that little impact really... (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jan 5, 12:37:17
- sarcasm is naughty (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 5, 12:22:19
- lol (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 5, 12:22:17
- he made little impact the last three seasons he was with us though (NCFC) - malkybarkid, Jan 5, 12:31:25
- Those results came just after we'd appointed a new manager (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 5, 12:19:02
- or we could end up appointing Phil Parkinson... (NCFC) - blindasabat, Jan 5, 12:22:28
- Which entirely proves my point (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 5, 12:25:18
- I hesitate to say this (NCFC) - camcan, Jan 5, 12:34:17
- Not sure it works with a manager who is not in control of transfers (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 5, 12:36:34
- Wouldn't necessarily have to controle transfers, just deal with managers requests. (NCFC) - megson, Jan 5, 12:41:26
- working at Peterborough! (NCFC) - camcan, Jan 5, 12:38:04
- nothing to do with them being loaded then i guess (NCFC) - blindasabat, Jan 5, 12:42:53
- are they *that* loaded (NCFC) - camcan, Jan 5, 12:48:12
- i think by League One and League Two standards they've spent heavily (NCFC) - blindasabat, Jan 5, 13:11:45
- are they *that* loaded (NCFC) - camcan, Jan 5, 12:48:12
- But I wonder how the manager feels about that > (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 5, 12:39:51
- Great I suspect (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 5, 12:49:50
- I'm basing all this on an interview with Fry on the radio at the w/e (NCFC) - camcan, Jan 5, 12:53:18
- Great I suspect (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 5, 12:49:50
- nothing to do with them being loaded then i guess (NCFC) - blindasabat, Jan 5, 12:42:53
- Not sure it works with a manager who is not in control of transfers (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 5, 12:36:34
- I hesitate to say this (NCFC) - camcan, Jan 5, 12:34:17
- Which entirely proves my point (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 5, 12:25:18
- or we could end up appointing Phil Parkinson... (NCFC) - blindasabat, Jan 5, 12:22:28
- he was injured for most of it...we're not exactly flying high without him (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jan 5, 12:23:47
- Is it honestly another nail in his coffin though? I doubt it. (n/m) (NCFC) - malkybarkid, Jan 5, 11:59:30
- i don't see it as a slight on Roeder (NCFC) - south, Jan 5, 12:12:38
- i think he's given a bit more detail on why he's not training at Colney (n/m) (NCFC) - blindasabat, Jan 5, 12:16:27
- Well, it doesn't help (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 5, 12:00:48
- i don't see it as a slight on Roeder (NCFC) - south, Jan 5, 12:12:38
- Most of our points last season came when he wasn't in the team (NCFC) - pants, Jan 5, 12:16:46
- It might be a hobnail in a chimbley sweep's boot. (NCFC) - malkybarkid, Jan 5, 11:56:52
- It's a year on since I sat at Bramall Lane, watching Huckerby not track back (NCFC) - pants, Jan 5, 11:52:38
- Not really, just rehashing the same old story again. (NCFC) - malkybarkid, Jan 5, 11:52:01
- Just the timing of it being put out... (NCFC) - DemoniCanary, Jan 5, 11:58:05
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.