fair enough, I think of it another way usually
That he has respect for both the loanies and the old pros, and like other managers in the prem, he chops and changes the starting line up around, because it's the modern way
I don't think he'll see it as dropping anyone, more a case of who he wants to play that week at that time
This kind of thing came up with Cureton last year, and probably will now cos he's at Barnsley, but many thought Roeder didn't like Cureton because he was playing him sometimes and not others. He does the same with Russell but Russell gets on with it, as does fothers
Along the way, Cureton, and his opportunities to shine haven't materialised, and he's taken it the wrong way, and appears to want out instead of getting stuck in
But hey ho, that's the way I see it, I don't see it as other pros hating Roeder cos they're dropped, I just think he's trying to bring what he's learnt at other clubs to the championship
I won't last too long debating this, cos you and me can agree and disagree, but there'll always be the obvious "what a pile of s**t" replies, and they're usually the reason I don't delve into long replies much, because that's the nature of this forum
As it's you, or if it was someone else, I'll say it cos you want to know my view, and you're not using the question as an angler to rip the s**t after (you just know scc will probably be the first to reply on this, a, cos it's a long reply, b because I've put some effort into it, and c, it's the perfect opportunity for a good old aggro starter "can anyone translate this message, tee hee, that'll get pants well radged, this is going to be an evening to remember isn't it? tee hee hee hee )
:)
Posted By: pants on December 28th 2008 at 20:17:44
Message Thread
- OK, so I see most are calling for Roeder to go... (NCFC) - conker, Dec 28, 19:22:05
- How about Santa? He is only busy one day of the year and we dont play that day (n/m) (NCFC) - conker, Dec 28, 19:46:29
- John Ward (NCFC) - pants, Dec 28, 19:41:23
- Isn't there even a shred of doubt in your mind about Roeder? (NCFC) - duke of york, Dec 28, 19:45:22
- I think GR makes a few mistakes, but I also think he has a lot of good ideas too (NCFC) - pants, Dec 28, 19:57:11
- Fair enough (NCFC) - duke of york, Dec 28, 20:05:58
- fair enough, I think of it another way usually (NCFC) - pants, Dec 28, 20:17:44
- That's just apologetic drivel (n/m) (NCFC) - BillySteele, Dec 28, 20:02:22
- That's just apologetic drivel (n/m) (NCFC) - BillySteele, Dec 28, 20:02:22
- It can sit nicely alongside your profile of contrived pretentious crap then (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Dec 28, 20:07:27
- but he has an informed opinion (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 28, 20:09:39
- tee hee hee (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Dec 28, 20:23:31
- To be fair (NCFC) - duke of york, Dec 28, 20:10:37
- i'm a great judge of character tho (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 28, 20:11:55
- but he has an informed opinion (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 28, 20:09:39
- It can sit nicely alongside your profile of contrived pretentious crap then (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Dec 28, 20:07:27
- Fair enough (NCFC) - duke of york, Dec 28, 20:05:58
- I think GR makes a few mistakes, but I also think he has a lot of good ideas too (NCFC) - pants, Dec 28, 19:57:11
- are you really happy though? (NCFC) - Tombs, Dec 28, 19:44:59
- Isn't there even a shred of doubt in your mind about Roeder? (NCFC) - duke of york, Dec 28, 19:45:22
- Mike Phelan (n/m) (NCFC) - Tombs, Dec 28, 19:39:11
- Terry Phelan (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Dec 28, 19:39:46
- Dave Bassett, George Graham, Peter Reid usual suspects would be linked (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Dec 28, 19:34:39
- mike bassett (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 28, 19:35:25
- Mark Bowen was in the running last time (NCFC) - yarmyyarmy, Dec 28, 19:32:21
- I think Bowen would be a good shout (n/m) (NCFC) - Ben, Dec 28, 19:35:54
- Would you want to risk another rookie? (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Dec 28, 19:39:30
- Not sure - seems like a good assistant (NCFC) - duke of york, Dec 28, 19:38:02
- I think Bowen would be a good shout (n/m) (NCFC) - Ben, Dec 28, 19:35:54
- Huckerby as player manager (NCFC) - Ben, Dec 28, 19:27:43
- Big iwan with Huck's as assistant. Jubbly Bubbly. (n/m) (NCFC) - DrDublin, Dec 28, 19:29:51
- Malky (NCFC) - duke of york, Dec 28, 19:26:04
- i just can't understand those who rate roeder (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 28, 19:27:49
- Gie the bloke SOME credit, he certainly didn't fail last season (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Dec 28, 19:27:09
- OK, ultimately failed (NCFC) - duke of york, Dec 28, 19:30:35
- The most disapointing thing is that no improvement seems to have (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Dec 28, 19:33:56
- a miracle? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 28, 19:29:13
- Given where we were, how we were playing then yes, in football terms (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Dec 28, 19:31:07
- it was still early in the season (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 28, 19:32:41
- Yeah, we were playing triffic. Real champagne footy. (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Dec 28, 19:37:32
- Duffy was just unlucky (NCFC) - Reg Presley, Dec 28, 19:42:36
- do you watch us much? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 28, 19:39:57
- Duffy was shit too (NCFC) - duke of york, Dec 28, 19:38:59
- Yeah, we were playing triffic. Real champagne footy. (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Dec 28, 19:37:32
- it was still early in the season (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 28, 19:32:41
- Given where we were, how we were playing then yes, in football terms (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Dec 28, 19:31:07
- OK, ultimately failed (NCFC) - duke of york, Dec 28, 19:30:35
- there will be loads of applicants (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 28, 19:25:22
- you're clueless, rob newman applied last time, would you prefer him to glenn? (n/m) (NCFC) - samcd84, Dec 28, 19:41:19
- i said most you fucktard (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 28, 19:51:49
- who did you want in when roeder was appointed? (n/m) (NCFC) - samcd84, Dec 28, 19:56:08
- somebody competent (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 28, 19:57:10
- roeder's first season at newcastle (NCFC) - samcd84, Dec 28, 20:02:08
- the thing is (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 28, 20:08:18
- roeder's first season at newcastle (NCFC) - samcd84, Dec 28, 20:02:08
- somebody competent (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 28, 19:57:10
- who did you want in when roeder was appointed? (n/m) (NCFC) - samcd84, Dec 28, 19:56:08
- So he was the only one who applied? (NCFC) - duke of york, Dec 28, 19:42:03
- i'm just saying there will have been plenty of his ilk also, (NCFC) - samcd84, Dec 28, 19:47:38
- Bet you wouldn't have taken Phil Brown either (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Dec 28, 19:48:38
- never heard his name mentioned (n/m) (NCFC) - samcd84, Dec 28, 19:55:27
- I was using it as an example of how (NCFC) - duke of york, Dec 28, 19:56:53
- never heard his name mentioned (n/m) (NCFC) - samcd84, Dec 28, 19:55:27
- Bet you wouldn't have taken Phil Brown either (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Dec 28, 19:48:38
- i'm just saying there will have been plenty of his ilk also, (NCFC) - samcd84, Dec 28, 19:47:38
- i said most you fucktard (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 28, 19:51:49
- you're clueless, rob newman applied last time, would you prefer him to glenn? (n/m) (NCFC) - samcd84, Dec 28, 19:41:19
- ?ge Hareide (NCFC) - Hank the swede, Dec 28, 19:24:56
- No way Curbishley would come here, so can scrub his name off list. (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Dec 28, 19:24:28
- Prince Edward (NCFC) - Tombs, Dec 28, 19:23:31
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.