Thing is that his argument carries no weight
no-one thinks that constant changes of manager does any good. But it's what happens in the modern game. The only managers who stick around are those that are any good, or just happen to get on with the players at a club.
If you have the misfortune to appoint bad managers then they can't be left to run a club into the ground. We were right to get rid of Grant, because he'd clearly lost the plot. Roeder had a golden 15 games and it saved us, but after that we were dreadful.
This season has been more like the end of last season than the 15-game run, and Roeder is clearly not the best man manager, which explains his initial success at clubs before he's found out.
No-one with any sense can say, unequivocally, that he's the man for the job because he's done what he's doing here at every club he's ever been at. That cannot be a coincidence.
As things stand, we have lost four from five, including a Forest team full of kids, who lost 4-2 to Doncaster at home - and we deserved to lose it! The fans have turned, most of he players who were here before Roeder can't stand the bloke because of the way he's treated them, and unless he somehow turns this team into one that even looks like winning in the next two or three games, then he's got to go!
Posted By: duke of york on December 28th 2008 at 19:21:28
Message Thread
- Old heroes or new heroes there's only 1 way to find out - fight (NCFC) - lovely old job, Dec 28, 18:43:50
- well according to google... (NCFC) - forzancfc, Dec 28, 18:50:18
- Sorry sight if earnshaw is an old hero (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Dec 28, 18:45:54
- earnshaw scored loads for us (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 28, 18:47:33
- mwah xxxxxxxxx (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Dec 28, 18:50:21
- Is that now your stock answer (NCFC) - duke of york, Dec 28, 19:11:02
- no offence doy, cos I like you, but that's fucking hilarious considering (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Dec 28, 19:17:16
- why does it matter whether you like him? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 28, 19:18:58
- because after one of the older more pointless rows on here (NCFC) - pants, Dec 28, 19:27:01
- that made no sense whatsoever! (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 28, 19:33:55
- Well, there's your answer doy, which is why I found your remark funny (NCFC) - pants, Dec 28, 19:37:41
- what are you on about? (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 28, 19:41:16
- haha (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Dec 28, 19:39:18
- Well, there's your answer doy, which is why I found your remark funny (NCFC) - pants, Dec 28, 19:37:41
- that made no sense whatsoever! (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 28, 19:33:55
- because after one of the older more pointless rows on here (NCFC) - pants, Dec 28, 19:27:01
- why does it matter whether you like him? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 28, 19:18:58
- careful (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 28, 19:14:57
- Thing is that his argument carries no weight (NCFC) - duke of york, Dec 28, 19:21:28
- no offence doy, cos I like you, but that's fucking hilarious considering (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Dec 28, 19:17:16
- Is that now your stock answer (NCFC) - duke of york, Dec 28, 19:11:02
- mwah xxxxxxxxx (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Dec 28, 18:50:21
- earnshaw scored loads for us (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 28, 18:47:33
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.