I agree with you but it seems that no matter how poor

he plays he's never considered to be dropped or indeed substituted. Two goals in nine games is hardly brilliant and I wouldn't mind if he looked like he was trying and he set a few other people up with chances. I think that's why people booed Roeders substitutions of Croft and Wes because Sibierski was so poor he really should've been replaced. I know the counter-argument is that eventually he won the game for us and it's hard to argue against that. Something else I don't know whether anyone else noticed but he gave the ball away so easily and it led to their striker winning the penalty. When you think what Dion did for us in a similar role last season and what Sibierski adds it's incomparable.

Posted By: Chopper on October 27th 2008 at 11:49:42

Message Thread

How long have we got Sibierski for? (NCFC) - Charles21, Oct 27, 11:12:27
- I agree with you but it seems that no matter how poor (NCFC) - Chopper, Oct 27, 11:49:42
  - To pose a counter question, replace him with who? (NCFC) - megson, Oct 27, 12:10:53
  - people say he's good when the ball is at his feet (NCFC) - Charles21, Oct 27, 11:51:26
    - Iwan was a bit rubbish at first and then... (n/m) (NCFC) - Fierce Panda, Oct 27, 13:16:48
    - can't retain the ball with his feet but my guess is that (NCFC) - Chopper, Oct 27, 11:53:10
- lol (NCFC) - Tombs, Oct 27, 11:16:05
  - yes it was very odd (NCFC) - Charles21, Oct 27, 11:18:34
    - what was really weird was glenns post match praise for him (NCFC) - Tombs, Oct 27, 11:20:15
      - Yebbut with a striker, if they have 80 minutes of doing fuck all, but play a massive part (NCFC) - megson, Oct 27, 11:23:57
        
        he is infuriating though (NCFC) - Tombs, Oct 27, 11:26:13
        
        Yes, yes he is, very very annoying. I'll forgive him though (NCFC) - megson, Oct 27, 11:27:58
        
        which i guess is the right answer (NCFC) - Tombs, Oct 27, 11:36:19
        
        but he will do that 1 game in 8 by the looks (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Oct 27, 11:49:38
        
        He's a mystery (NCFC) - Old Git, Oct 27, 11:59:45
        
        gets him the nod over curo then? (n/m) (NCFC) - Tombs, Oct 27, 11:59:25
      - Why the f'''k did Marshall opt to lump it down the middle all match? (NCFC) - UtterlyHuckerby, Oct 27, 11:23:32
        
        i did however see doc play it out of defence on the ground to a midfielder (NCFC) - Tombs, Oct 27, 11:24:32
        
        'All day' Sesh Fabregras (n/m) (NCFC) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, Oct 27, 11:30:52
        
        whioops, I'm on it already! (n/m) (NCFC) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, Oct 27, 11:31:22
- not a fan of perfectly timed looping headers then 21? (n/m) (NCFC) - UtterlyHuckerby, Oct 27, 11:14:49
  - Yeah he had 2 huge moments in the game on Saturday (NCFC) - Charles21, Oct 27, 11:17:39
    - I agree. (n/m) (NCFC) - Chopper, Oct 27, 11:50:50
    - Yeah....Cureton. Impotence personified. (n/m) (NCFC) - UtterlyHuckerby, Oct 27, 11:20:39
      - where as Sibierski's two goals in nine games is rampant? (n/m) (NCFC) - Chopper, Oct 27, 11:51:18
        
        A Sibiersky post by 'Chopper' - I just have to: Flew one in 'nam in '71, one night me (NCFC) - malkybarkid, Oct 27, 12:20:01
- until January and no (n/m) (NCFC) - blindasabat, Oct 27, 11:12:52

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.