Croft should have started

We created nothing in the first half and his combination play with the right back could have offered a more viable attacking option, to at least provide temporary respite from the wave upon wave of attack which they mounted (imho).

Posted By: Buckscanary on November 7th 2007 at 09:59:35

Message Thread

Last nights game has to be taken in context (NCFC) - Buckscanary, Nov 7, 09:51:57
- Totally outplayed and outclassed by the best team in the league (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Nov 7, 09:55:05
  - Agreed not suprised (n/m) (NCFC) - Buckscanary, Nov 7, 10:03:19
- "the side which we chose to put out" (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Nov 7, 09:54:59
  - we should've put out West Brom's team intut... (n/m) (NCFC) - blindasabat, Nov 7, 09:59:50
    - Yes, but without the fuckstick manager. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Nov 7, 10:13:38
  - Croft should have started (NCFC) - Buckscanary, Nov 7, 09:59:35
  - Certainly not one with Smith on the wing! (NCFC) - phrankin, Nov 7, 09:58:24
    - Smith needs to f**k off (NCFC) - Buckscanary, Nov 7, 10:01:00
      - Bit harsh... (NCFC) - Brom, Nov 7, 10:03:47
        
        This is where Roeder's people skills need to kick in (NCFC) - Buckscanary, Nov 7, 10:08:30

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.