As much as it's annoying I think it was a red after seeing the replay

It was high, well away from the ball, and although I very much doubt he'd have meant that given it being 2-2 and there being zero controversy.

Great come back and now the simple task of taking points of Watford in just two days time.....hmm lol

Posted By: CityForLife on November 4th 2007 at 14:41:53

Message Thread

hux orffff (n/m) (NCFC) - Tombroeder, Nov 4, 14:37:21
- Fool. Don't need to lose him for three games :-( (n/m) (NCFC) - Oozak Hunt, Nov 4, 14:39:53
- On a 50/50 challenge. You cheating bastard Styles. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arganth, Nov 4, 14:38:10
  - You are joking right? (NCFC) - WhitefriarsWilly, Nov 4, 14:47:22
    - Well said (NCFC) - Bluelagos, Nov 4, 15:03:57
    - It looked nasty to me (NCFC) - KentonCanary, Nov 4, 14:55:27
  - Eh? you don't go into a 50-50 challenge like that! (n/m) (NCFC) - HairyBobbingManAss, Nov 4, 14:39:15
    - They both went in exactly the same. You cannot argue that. (NCFC) - Arganth, Nov 4, 14:40:11
      - As much as it's annoying I think it was a red after seeing the replay (NCFC) - CityForLife, Nov 4, 14:41:53
      - Except Hucks' stubs were about a foot higher than the other bloke's (n/m) (NCFC) - HairyBobbingManAss, Nov 4, 14:41:19
        
        swap a b for a d (n/m) (NCFC) - HairyBobbingManAss, Nov 4, 14:41:45
      - needless though and now he-s on his arse for 3 games (NCFC) - Tombroeder, Nov 4, 14:41:14
        
        Yep, agree with that. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arganth, Nov 4, 14:43:57
- very silly, can't disagree with that. (n/m) (NCFC) - HairyBobbingManAss, Nov 4, 14:37:54
  - yup (n/m) (NCFC) - Tombroeder, Nov 4, 14:38:08

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.