I think with Spillane

he had had that bang on the head and had become tentative because he was on a booking. If I had been manager I would have done 3 straight swaps - Croft for Huckerby, Martin for Cureton, and Russell for Spillane. But then if I had been manager I wouldn't have fiddled with the side from Tuesday night.

Posted By: alsosprachcreasotra on September 30th 2007 at 14:21:09

Message Thread

WHY? (NCFC) - Burge, Sep 30, 13:43:53
- why did he take Spillane off rather than Hucks when Croft came on? (NCFC) - mr carra, Sep 30, 14:04:35
  - I think with Spillane (NCFC) - alsosprachcreasotra, Sep 30, 14:21:09
    - while i agree subbing hucks is sacriligous (sp) (NCFC) - megson, Sep 30, 15:35:05
  - I seem to remember Spillane... (NCFC) - sheffieldcanary, Sep 30, 14:11:33
- No, Cureton in for Strihavka (n/m) (NCFC) - conker, Sep 30, 13:46:33
  - Cureton = Not good enough (NCFC) - Burge, Sep 30, 13:49:42
    - Wrong (NCFC) - conker, Sep 30, 13:58:07
      - cureton will score if he is getting the ball? (NCFC) - Burge, Sep 30, 14:00:32
        
        and brown - he averages 4 goals a season at this level... (NCFC) - phrankin, Sep 30, 14:44:10
- Answer because Grant is a Twat (n/m) (NCFC) - lappinitup, Sep 30, 13:45:53
  - Can't argue with you there? (n/m) (NCFC) - Burge, Sep 30, 13:50:09

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.