Someone had to be sold - someone of real value

so probably one of sara, sarge or rowe - it would have been a bit of a disaster selling sarge and tho I'd rather have sold Rowe, I think we'd not have got the money yet, given he's not managed to get thru a whole season - so realistically, it probably had to be sara

Posted By: paulg on August 3rd 2024 at 10:41:29

Message Thread

If the consolation of selling Sara is keeping Rowe and Sargent then I'm fine with it (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Aug 3, 09:46:25
- #VMT (NCFC) - JD3, Aug 3, 11:43:00
- This is realistic (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Aug 3, 11:06:12
  - Minus wages, agent and signing on fees we've paid out (n/m) (NCFC) - seminated_woolly, Aug 3, 11:52:23
    - Not really, player contracts are capital expenditure and amortised (NCFC) - watfordcanary, Aug 3, 12:38:03
    - Of course. Have a crack at those & come back to us. (n/m) (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Aug 3, 12:20:15
- Someone had to be sold - someone of real value (NCFC) - paulg, Aug 3, 10:41:29
  - Away with your realism (NCFC) - Old Git, Aug 3, 10:47:36
    - Reeves was a bad one; Sutton sale really got to me too (NCFC) - paulg, Aug 3, 11:32:58
      - Sutton / fox (NCFC) - Cardiff Canary, Aug 3, 12:05:29
- Do you think we can get Rowe to sign a new deal? (NCFC) - JoeyDeacon, Aug 3, 09:55:18
  - 1 year with a club option of another year (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Aug 3, 10:10:16
    - Ah I didn’t realise that (NCFC) - JoeyDeacon, Aug 3, 10:31:37
      - Yep (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Aug 3, 10:34:25

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.