There is no attempt to use excessive force or brutality on Howson
If anything Sainz is reacting to the fact he was hurt by Howson’s tackle. That’s why he has his legs as he does as it probably hurt. People may be right in that the panel may close ranks and not overturn it but there is no way that is violent conduct worthy of a red card under the laws of the game.
Posted By: Jim on March 6th 2024 at 22:33:03
Message Thread
- from this angle its about as innocuous as they come (NCFC) - Garboldisham, Mar 6, 22:05:31
- When sainz raises both his legs together (NCFC) - Duck, Mar 6, 22:08:31
- It’s not a kick and there is no excessive force or brutality (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Mar 6, 22:20:30
- It doesn’t matter if there isn’t excessive force (n/m) (NCFC) - Duck, Mar 6, 22:27:12
- Yes it does. That’s absolutely the point. That’s the definition of violent conduct (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Mar 6, 22:27:47
- But there’s an attempt (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 6, 22:30:00
- There is no attempt to use excessive force or brutality on Howson (NCFC) - Jim, Mar 6, 22:33:03
- Exactly (n/m) (NCFC) - Whyohwhy, Mar 6, 22:41:51
- by sccs reasons, getting up and pushing someone after a foul would be a red too (n/m) (NCFC) - Garboldisham, Mar 6, 22:38:25
- Studs is different though isn’t it? (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 6, 22:43:39
- There is no attempt to use excessive force or brutality on Howson (NCFC) - Jim, Mar 6, 22:33:03
- But there’s an attempt (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 6, 22:30:00
- Yes it does. That’s absolutely the point. That’s the definition of violent conduct (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Mar 6, 22:27:47
- It’s a clear kick ffs (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 6, 22:25:42
- It doesn’t matter if there isn’t excessive force (n/m) (NCFC) - Duck, Mar 6, 22:27:12
- Yep just brain dead on his part (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 6, 22:12:18
- Nearly every pundit has described it as incredibly soft (NCFC) - Duck, Mar 6, 22:20:20
- Soft in terms of not injuring his opponent (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 6, 22:26:29
- Nearly every pundit has described it as incredibly soft (NCFC) - Duck, Mar 6, 22:20:20
- It’s not a kick and there is no excessive force or brutality (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Mar 6, 22:20:30
- This one much clearer (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 6, 22:07:38
- definitely moved his leg, stupidity on his part (NCFC) - littletinyphil, Mar 6, 22:09:19
- It’s still not violent conduct or serious foul play (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Mar 6, 22:15:49
- How is it not violent to kick out? (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 6, 22:17:03
- Read the law (NCFC) - Jim, Mar 6, 22:21:32
- So a player kicks out at attacking player to stop him getting clear if it's not last (NCFC) - Whyohwhy, Mar 6, 22:19:15
- How is it not violent to kick out? (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 6, 22:17:03
- about an inch. Im surprised Howson even felt it (NCFC) - Garboldisham, Mar 6, 22:11:19
- Yeah but there was movement and a yellow (NCFC) - littletinyphil, Mar 6, 22:14:15
- Did Bradley Johnson (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 6, 22:13:17
- he just moved his head back. a natural reaction, not hopping around like he'd been shot (n/m) (NCFC) - Garboldisham, Mar 6, 22:27:21
- Ffs (NCFC) - Stroud Canary, Mar 6, 22:10:25
- Yep, take his balls off (n/m) (NCFC) - jamesward, Mar 6, 23:11:08
- Think that’s why it’s so annoying, gave the ref a choice (n/m) (NCFC) - littletinyphil, Mar 6, 22:12:39
- And a chance for Howson to make the most of it (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 6, 22:13:47
- It’s still not violent conduct or serious foul play (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Mar 6, 22:15:49
- definitely moved his leg, stupidity on his part (NCFC) - littletinyphil, Mar 6, 22:09:19
- When sainz raises both his legs together (NCFC) - Duck, Mar 6, 22:08:31
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.