For me, that confirms the Red...

If I see that I'm sending him off, 1st minute, 90th minute.

But that's me watching through 15 years of refereeing eyes.

Hope it's overturned but good chance it won't.

5 match ban if the appeal is deemed frivolous.

Posted By: Worthing Yellow on March 6th 2024 at 21:02:22

Message Thread

Better angle of the challenge (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Mar 6, 20:52:47
- For me, that confirms the Red... (NCFC) - Worthing Yellow, Mar 6, 21:02:22
  - Christ (NCFC) - Ghost Ship Belly, Mar 6, 21:21:15
  - If that's a red you see worse challenges week in week out (NCFC) - Whyohwhy, Mar 6, 21:09:45
    - But it wasn't a challenge though (NCFC) - Worthing Yellow, Mar 6, 21:18:24
  - The frivolous stuff was binned years ago (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 6, 21:03:02
    - Stand corrected on that, hadn't picked that up (n/m) (NCFC) - Worthing Yellow, Mar 6, 21:04:29
- Pathetic, poor little lamb. (NCFC) - Barno, Mar 6, 20:59:32
- Can’t see any violent conduct there (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Mar 6, 20:55:36
  - Nope (n/m) (NCFC) - Whyohwhy, Mar 6, 20:56:33
    - Why is he pushing his leg up into Howson? (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 6, 20:59:59
      - He's holding his leg in the air as he's been kicked on it (NCFC) - Whyohwhy, Mar 6, 21:03:30
        
        There was up movement after his leg came down (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 6, 21:07:48
      - No force, no violence (n/m) (NCFC) - norwaay, Mar 6, 21:01:28
- Soft but still stupid (NCFC) - Jester, Mar 6, 20:54:52
- There is no kick out there he's holding his leg in the air and touches his studs no effort (NCFC) - Whyohwhy, Mar 6, 20:54:35
- Soft but made a motion towards him studs showing (n/m) (NCFC) - Tony Martin, Mar 6, 20:54:13
  - I’m not so sure about that. I can’t see a motion towards him (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Mar 6, 20:56:44
    - Slow mo it (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 6, 20:59:32
      - And he’s looking directly at Howson (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 6, 21:01:28
        
        Don’t think there’s any pushing, his leg maybe straightens a bit (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Mar 6, 21:05:46
  - Exactly (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 6, 20:55:14
- Yep clear red ffs (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 6, 20:53:39
  - There was nil force behind it. Not sure you could call it violent. (n/m) (NCFC) - JD3, Mar 6, 20:54:59
    - The motion into Howson enough surely (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 6, 20:55:42
      - It is clearly not violent conduct (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Mar 6, 21:00:10
      - From the red button live I presumed he'd kicked out but it's soooo fucking soft innit. (n/m) (NCFC) - JD3, Mar 6, 20:56:37
        
        Sainz simply had no reason for his feet to be there (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 6, 20:57:47
        
        They really do just brush against him though. (NCFC) - norwaay, Mar 6, 21:00:23
        
        Disagree about intent (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 6, 21:02:34
        
        Agree, but he stopped short of anything meaningful (n/m) (NCFC) - norwaay, Mar 6, 21:05:46
        
        He did yeah (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 6, 21:07:01

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.