Wagner’s run in record

When he’s had the last 10 games of a season

Hudd 2016 - 9 points
Hudd 17 - 10
Hudd 18 (Prem) - 7
Schalke 20 (Bundesliga) - 3
Norwich 23 - 7

😬

Posted By: SCC 28 on February 19th 2024 at 11:49:08

Message Thread

Wagner’s run in record (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 19, 11:49:08
- So yet again we're potentially on the verge of one of (NCFC) - protheroe fitzgibbon, Feb 19, 15:48:45
  - If we only score 3 in the next game then clearly he should be sacked. (NCFC) - usacanary, Feb 19, 18:47:39
- Bloody hell 🫣 (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 19, 15:15:43
- This year Wagner is averaging 2.13 ppg (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Feb 19, 12:57:04
  - Coventry with the same record (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 19, 13:29:14
  - Hopefully the final 8 games we can (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 19, 13:02:33
    - do that too (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 19, 13:02:44
- another reason to sack the tosser (n/m) (NCFC) - ghostof barry butler, Feb 19, 12:18:34
  - It’s a nice run in tbh (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 19, 12:25:58
  - Be mad to sack him now (NCFC) - Old Man, Feb 19, 12:21:30
    - I think that would be the vast majority view (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 19, 12:26:57
      - There it is again "the vast majority"... (NCFC) - Pixelman, Feb 19, 14:58:57
        
        ??? (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 19, 15:03:28
      - was I ...... (NCFC) - ghostof barry butler, Feb 19, 12:30:58
    - VMT ^^^ (n/m) (NCFC) - DrDublin, Feb 19, 12:25:11
- 42 (n/m) (NCFC) - Deep Thought, Feb 19, 12:06:07
- Sixth time lucky, then ? (n/m) (NCFC) - Pam Demic, Feb 19, 11:59:09
  - Did get promoted with Huddersfield (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 19, 12:05:20
- We are due a losing streak tbf (n/m) (NCFC) - jamesward, Feb 19, 11:58:08
  - Fuck off Selwyn (n/m) (NCFC) - Ken Breadstick, Feb 19, 13:13:12
  - That's the spirit (NCFC) - Old Man, Feb 19, 12:17:35
    - Anyone down to Middlesbro in 13th place (NCFC) - Pam Demic, Feb 19, 12:54:29
    - Based purely on Wagner’s long history of streakiness (n/m) (NCFC) - jamesward, Feb 19, 12:34:40
      - so, Daniel Farke (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Feb 19, 13:06:21
        
        Because that was the Prem (n/m) (NCFC) - jamesward, Feb 19, 13:07:45
        
        I wasn't aware that was a distinction (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Feb 19, 13:10:59
        
        V streaky at Hudds in the promo season (NCFC) - jamesward, Feb 19, 13:13:46
        
        But it still seems, to me, like a weird label (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Feb 19, 13:18:12
        
        Because that’s one season (NCFC) - jamesward, Feb 19, 13:20:00
        
        With a shit team (n/m) (NCFC) - jamesward, Feb 19, 13:08:14
        
        Worse than Luton? (n/m) (NCFC) - megson, Feb 19, 14:06:14
        
        It seems so (NCFC) - jamesward, Feb 19, 14:14:11
    - Finish 5th - beat scum in the playoffs (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 19, 12:19:58
      - That would be a season for the ages wouldn't it (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Man, Feb 19, 12:21:44
        
        except it would be followed by the season of a thousand cuts (NCFC) - Tombs, Feb 19, 12:24:29
        
        This time, more than any other time, this time (NCFC) - jamesward, Feb 19, 13:09:04
        
        Find a way to get away this time, getting it all together, we'll get it right. (NCFC) - megson, Feb 19, 14:05:45
  - Think it's generally accepted that 72 (NCFC) - Pam Demic, Feb 19, 12:05:54
    - as someone pointed out to me on this board (NCFC) - ghostof barry butler, Feb 19, 12:21:06
      - It would have been for the teams finishing in the top 6 (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 19, 12:32:12
        
        Thats what I was alluding to (NCFC) - Pam Demic, Feb 19, 12:47:39

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.