Barnes wasn’t in the eyeline

And the deflection off the defender who was, took it past the keeper.

And the first he was probably behind the ball while the defender closing the cross down may well have been playing him on anyway

Posted By: SCC 28 on December 16th 2023 at 15:41:30

Message Thread

So much better without VAR (NCFC) - Charles21, Dec 16, 15:33:52
- About time for you to FUCK OFF 21 but I'll take it. FUCK OFF 21 CUNT (n/m) (NCFC) - MonkeyPuzzle, Dec 16, 15:37:52
  - Are you ok? (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Dec 16, 15:45:50
    - He isn’t (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 16, 15:47:05
      - Thought not (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Dec 16, 15:49:42
- I think VAR allows both goals tbh (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 16, 15:36:07
  - No chance (NCFC) - Charles21, Dec 16, 15:38:03
    - Barnes wasn’t in the eyeline (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 16, 15:41:30
    - Agreed. I actually didn’t celebrate the first immediately as I called offside as the cross (NCFC) - DH Yellow, Dec 16, 15:41:11
      - Almost certainly onside (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 16, 15:42:27

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.