How true.
The sacking of Daniel was a turning point but not the sort we are looking for now. I recall being incredulous when I read the BBC report. It was always supposed to be the case that we had a succession plan. The appointment of Smith, who was not available the day Daniel was sacked, completely disproves that contention. My view is that they were hoping to get Eddie Howe who was out of work at the time and had it not been for the Beheaders taking over Newcastle at almost the same time, that might have happened. When they knew they couldn’t get him they went into a tailspin and took what was available.
The other turning point happened in that close season when fan power ensured that we were not sponsored by the misogynistic betting company that was going to pay us £4m for the honour. Webber went apes**t at that which goes to prove exactly the kind of guy he is. Just go for the money whatever the ethics might be. We will be well rid. What worries me is what comes next.
Posted By: Jambocanary on October 28th 2023 at 20:58:21
Message Thread
- And I make no apology for again reminding you that…. (NCFC) - Fudpucker, Oct 28, 18:13:27
- Ironically the theory was that the “fans” had turned on Farke after the Leeds game (NCFC) - Ruttles, Oct 28, 18:44:26
- How true. (NCFC) - Jambocanary, Oct 28, 20:58:21
- 100% this. I feel the same (NCFC) - Worthing Yellow, Oct 28, 20:41:24
- Absolutely right, but not according to a very few dissenters, evidently. (n/m) (NCFC) - Fudpucker, Oct 28, 19:00:36
- And Mike Bassett shouldn’t have left us for the England job (n/m) (NCFC) - um_gah, Oct 28, 18:37:54
- I make no apology telling you you are wrong (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 28, 18:18:27
- He had to go. (NCFC) - Men without hats, Oct 28, 18:33:01
- What a constructive reply ! You’ve really changed my mind ! Not (n/m) (NCFC) - Fudpucker, Oct 28, 18:19:52
- Then I’m glad you agree with me ? (evidently ) ? (n/m) (NCFC) - Fudpucker, Oct 28, 18:30:12
- I’m fine, but I’d be better if we’d never sacked Farke. Just like the club would be. (n/m) (NCFC) - Fudpucker, Oct 28, 19:02:32
- No. Are you ok? (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 28, 18:35:45
- Wasn’t trying to (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 28, 18:23:20
- Then I’m glad you agree with me ? (evidently ) ? (n/m) (NCFC) - Fudpucker, Oct 28, 18:30:12
- If he was terrible at the end it was (NCFC) - Pompatus of Creosote, Oct 28, 18:17:23
- The majority of fans had turned and it was toxic (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Oct 28, 18:15:49
- Bollocks was it Toxic (NCFC) - Kangol Canary, Oct 28, 18:35:44
- Fast food football (n/m) (NCFC) - Lentil Weaver, Oct 28, 18:16:59
- Vimto 👍 (n/m) (NCFC) - brianguthrysluvchild, Oct 28, 18:14:50
- Ironically the theory was that the “fans” had turned on Farke after the Leeds game (NCFC) - Ruttles, Oct 28, 18:44:26
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.