why not drop Gilmour?
he might be a bright player but he's contributed very little and been conspicuously slow in covering when he's lost the ball.
I'd drop him and use him to change the system when needed
Posted By: Garboldisham on August 31st 2021 at 18:09:50
Message Thread
- Going to be interesting to see how Farke fits both Gilmour and Normann in the team (NCFC) - Knitted Jesus, Aug 31, 09:35:43
- why not drop Gilmour? (NCFC) - Garboldisham, Aug 31, 18:09:50
- Squad game innit (n/m) (NCFC) - APB, Aug 31, 11:09:14
- Would think Melou will miss out (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Aug 31, 10:25:35
- I'd be very disappointed if that was the case. (NCFC) - Cardiff Canary, Aug 31, 14:48:14
- I think it will evolve over time so that PLM is a squad player (NCFC) - Maillot Jaune, Aug 31, 11:44:37
- qgreed (n/m) (NCFC) - shoddy, Aug 31, 11:03:05
- Yes (n/m) (NCFC) - Legacy Fan, Aug 31, 10:45:00
- Rough on the lanky Frenchman (NCFC) - The Onioneater, Aug 31, 10:39:43
- Interesting. There might be a question about his tackling I guess (NCFC) - Knitted Jesus, Aug 31, 09:54:27
- I guess playing next to kante is different to playing next to mclean, Rupp and PLM (n/m) (NCFC) - Legacy Fan, Aug 31, 10:46:09
- My Chelski friends assured me that Gilmour "loves a tackle" (NCFC) - Old Git, Aug 31, 10:07:46
- Can people please refrain from posting rumours regarding anyone's private life (n/m) (NCFC) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, Aug 31, 10:59:43
- I thought I read that one of things that helped us get Gilmour (NCFC) - Duck, Aug 31, 09:48:08
- But presumably PLM would still be dropped (NCFC) - Kangol Canary, Aug 31, 14:56:48
- That formation suits cantwell better too (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Aug 31, 11:01:43
- Absolutely (n/m) (NCFC) - Duck, Aug 31, 11:14:49
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.