I think so. At least he's toned down the petulance
Posted By: Skeleton Bob on March 7th 2020 at 17:27:48
Message Thread
- Defence did OK, Hanley motm, Godfrey good (NCFC) - duke of york, Mar 7, 16:59:59
- Except for defending crosses. Like ALL season. We’re incredibly bad a defending crosses. (n/m) (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Mar 7, 17:20:56
- vmt - the back four have (Wolves aside) been excellent recently (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Mar 7, 17:01:49
- Emi was anonymous today. (n/m) (NCFC) - Men without hats, Mar 7, 17:03:32
- yep, hasn't looked as good since being dropped (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Mar 7, 17:05:23
- the other possibility being that we are seeing why he was dropped (n/m) (NCFC) - CWC, Mar 7, 17:16:01
- I think so. At least he's toned down the petulance (n/m) (NCFC) - Skeleton Bob, Mar 7, 17:27:48
- Not sure that makes sense (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Mar 7, 17:20:33
- isn't that what managers have to do? (NCFC) - CWC, Mar 7, 18:41:15
- I think if Farke was so good at predicting how players would perform in future games (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Mar 7, 19:03:22
- He got injured he wasn’t dropped ... (NCFC) - loz, Mar 7, 20:27:53
- I think if Farke was so good at predicting how players would perform in future games (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Mar 7, 19:03:22
- isn't that what managers have to do? (NCFC) - CWC, Mar 7, 18:41:15
- Hardly surprising (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Mar 7, 17:06:46
- He's a bit petulant isn't he. (NCFC) - Men without hats, Mar 7, 17:14:08
- the other possibility being that we are seeing why he was dropped (n/m) (NCFC) - CWC, Mar 7, 17:16:01
- yep, hasn't looked as good since being dropped (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Mar 7, 17:05:23
- Emi was anonymous today. (n/m) (NCFC) - Men without hats, Mar 7, 17:03:32
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.