Theoretically it could be even bigger.
Posted By: protheroe fitzgibbon on September 17th 2019 at 14:58:26
Message Thread
- Would our current team beat the 92/93 vintage? Hmm? (NCFC) - duke of york, Sep 17, 13:17:35
- Tricky question, let's use norway's assumption and compare like for like (NCFC) - Charles21, Sep 17, 13:30:13
- Murder them. But I’m of the belief that pretty much any of our post league one squads (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Sep 17, 13:23:21
- Not if they followed the same "nutritional" advice. (n/m) (NCFC) - protheroe fitzgibbon, Sep 17, 14:01:16
- Pretty sure Rob Newman's chin would be immune to "nutritional" advice (n/m) (NCFC) - mr carra, Sep 17, 14:36:42
- Theoretically it could be even bigger. (n/m) (NCFC) - protheroe fitzgibbon, Sep 17, 14:58:26
- Pretty sure Rob Newman's chin would be immune to "nutritional" advice (n/m) (NCFC) - mr carra, Sep 17, 14:36:42
- Well yes. They'd beat every side that won the World Cup up to and including about 1986 too (NCFC) - norway, Sep 17, 13:26:00
- Yes, it assumes the levels of fitness and sports science are equal (NCFC) - duke of york, Sep 17, 13:28:31
- Can we play Sutton at CB? (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Sep 17, 13:33:56
- Only if you play Pukki there too (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Sep 17, 13:36:10
- Can we play Sutton at CB? (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Sep 17, 13:33:56
- Yes, it assumes the levels of fitness and sports science are equal (NCFC) - duke of york, Sep 17, 13:28:31
- Not if they followed the same "nutritional" advice. (n/m) (NCFC) - protheroe fitzgibbon, Sep 17, 14:01:16
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.