No
the Ct (well, the Scottish Ct) thinks it was motivated by an improper purpose, which is not the same thing
Posted By: paulg on September 11th 2019 at 14:10:59
Message Thread
- A boring lawyer writes (General Chat) - Old Git, Sep 11, 13:02:22
- Thanks OG, really interesting. (n/m) (General Chat) - megson, Sep 11, 13:50:32
- ^^^The Secret Barrister (General Chat) - NorthByNorthWalsham, Sep 11, 13:47:46
- Wouldn't it be funny if they took it to the EU court afterwards how fucking ironic (n/m) (General Chat) - KetteringRyu, Sep 11, 13:36:41
- Ha ha, that would be top level trolling if so. (n/m) (General Chat) - megson, Sep 11, 13:50:59
- They can't. It's a domestic matter only (n/m) (General Chat) - duke of york, Sep 11, 13:37:00
- I know. (General Chat) - KetteringRyu, Sep 11, 13:48:05
- Excellent...but no mention of what was for lunch.... (n/m) (General Chat) - BSE Canary, Sep 11, 13:26:56
- Too meny wurds m'lud (n/m) (General Chat) - bird table, Sep 11, 13:14:15
- And very very boring as advertised (n/m) (General Chat) - Steve in Holland, Sep 11, 13:24:58
- Thanks OG - I think that answers my pondering below about how it pans out in the (General Chat) - Jim, Sep 11, 13:09:36
- I think it will be a conjoined appeal, with the English/Welsh and Scottish appeals heard (General Chat) - Old Git, Sep 11, 13:19:08
- % chance of the appeal succeeding? (n/m) (General Chat) - SCC 28, Sep 11, 13:20:50
- Who’s paying? (n/m) (General Chat) - Old Git, Sep 11, 13:28:35
- Newcastle are in for half (n/m) (General Chat) - Ralf Scrampton, Sep 11, 13:35:13
- Who’s paying? (n/m) (General Chat) - Old Git, Sep 11, 13:28:35
- % chance of the appeal succeeding? (n/m) (General Chat) - SCC 28, Sep 11, 13:20:50
- I think it will be a conjoined appeal, with the English/Welsh and Scottish appeals heard (General Chat) - Old Git, Sep 11, 13:19:08
- So the English courts have said that (General Chat) - duke of york, Sep 11, 13:06:45
- CORRECT (n/m) (General Chat) - KetteringRyu, Sep 11, 13:24:30
- But not without valid reason (n/m) (General Chat) - SCC 28, Sep 11, 13:12:25
- Yes, but is OG saying that all parliamentary conventions (General Chat) - duke of york, Sep 11, 13:16:03
- This part from above answers it (General Chat) - KetteringRyu, Sep 11, 13:26:28
- That’s been Pannick’s big point (actually his only point) (General Chat) - Old Git, Sep 11, 13:25:57
- That's got to be the issue surely? (General Chat) - CWC, Sep 11, 14:47:04
- Interesting. Are there any repercussions for misleading the Queen (General Chat) - duke of york, Sep 11, 13:36:01
- a lucky dip pick from the Duke of York's little black book (General Chat) - Ralf Scrampton, Sep 11, 13:44:04
- Was the Queen misled? (General Chat) - paulg, Sep 11, 13:38:48
- The court thinks so (n/m) (General Chat) - duke of york, Sep 11, 13:54:17
- No (General Chat) - paulg, Sep 11, 14:10:59
- Different to the purpose he stated, yes (n/m) (General Chat) - duke of york, Sep 11, 14:14:14
- But did he state a purpose when advising the Queen? (n/m) (General Chat) - paulg, Sep 11, 14:19:08
- Misled and lied to (General Chat) - SCC 28, Sep 11, 14:12:46
- Perfectly possible that the public was lied to ... (General Chat) - paulg, Sep 11, 14:18:43
- Which they managed to determine within a 5 minute hearing. (n/m) (General Chat) - KetteringRyu, Sep 11, 14:13:56
- The don’t hang about do they (General Chat) - SCC 28, Sep 11, 14:15:14
- Different to the purpose he stated, yes (n/m) (General Chat) - duke of york, Sep 11, 14:14:14
- No (General Chat) - paulg, Sep 11, 14:10:59
- Don't go there, SCC will just state "its unlawful" (n/m) (General Chat) - KetteringRyu, Sep 11, 13:49:15
- A good decision too (n/m) (General Chat) - SCC 28, Sep 11, 13:52:11
- The court thinks so (n/m) (General Chat) - duke of york, Sep 11, 13:54:17
- Is this right OG? (n/m) (General Chat) - duke of york, Sep 11, 13:24:05
- *to stop a government (n/m) (General Chat) - duke of york, Sep 11, 13:19:56
- Yes, but is OG saying that all parliamentary conventions (General Chat) - duke of york, Sep 11, 13:16:03
- That'll be £385. ;) (n/m) (General Chat) - DrDublin, Sep 11, 13:03:48
- You missed a zero Dubbers (n/m) (General Chat) - SimonOTBC, Sep 11, 13:10:47
- And VAT! (n/m) (General Chat) - Old Git, Sep 11, 13:16:04
- Tried to get away with it. (n/m) (General Chat) - DrDublin, Sep 11, 13:13:49
- You missed a zero Dubbers (n/m) (General Chat) - SimonOTBC, Sep 11, 13:10:47
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.