Definitely would take Jacob

if it would fit in our budget and wage structure. Would provide attacking width, where we are a bit reliant on Hernandez, and also could fill in at left back.

Wouldn't take Josh.

Posted By: Mecagoenti on January 28th 2019 at 15:21:58

Message Thread

Would you like to see one of the murphlets back? (NCFC) - Lager top, Jan 28, 12:53:07
- no. we've moved on. (n/m) (NCFC) - pab, Jan 28, 18:37:37
- Definitely would take Jacob (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Jan 28, 15:21:58
- Not fit to lace blassies gode boots (n/m) (NCFC) - MIKEWALKER, Jan 28, 14:52:18
  - Are you OK MIke? (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jan 28, 15:28:06
    - HAVE YOU HAD A BRAIN INJURY? (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jan 28, 15:53:12
- No. The problems are at the back. (n/m) (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Jan 28, 14:21:38
  - VMT (NCFC) - Timmy_Goat, Jan 28, 15:14:39
- No....don't work hard enough and can't tiki taka (n/m) (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Jan 28, 14:06:26
- I would take one loan till the end of the season (n/m) (NCFC) - strap_on sally, Jan 28, 13:58:31
  - As back-up maybe (n/m) (NCFC) - revsimon, Jan 31, 02:19:42
- For free and if they could be coached to not give the ball away nine times out of 10. (n/m) (NCFC) - norway, Jan 28, 13:38:07
  - For freeeeeeeeeee? (n/m) (NCFC) - Augustus Pablo, Jan 28, 14:59:18
- No (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 28, 13:35:23
- No thanks (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jan 28, 13:25:31
- Yes to Jacob, he was very good for us and would help with the home grown rule (n/m) (NCFC) - Hit Squadie, Jan 28, 13:24:50
  - And must be getting quite good at it by now (n/m) (NCFC) - revsimon, Jan 28, 16:22:41
  - and he's used to sitting on the bench now (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Jan 28, 15:44:12
- No, they are both shit! (n/m) (NCFC) - Thegelman, Jan 28, 13:09:05

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.