No we should keep some good players notwithstanding the fact that - Wrath of the Barclay

No we should keep some good players notwithstanding the fact that

They are big earners. Not just flog any big earners who attract the slightest bit of interest.

Posted By: Jim on May 31st 2017 at 19:46:39

Message Thread

The pinkun reports seem to suggest something in the Dorrans/Rangers links (NCFC) - Jim, May 31, 19:07:22
- howson is clearly a bigger miss but........ (NCFC) - usacanary, May 31, 21:40:13
- Dorrans was not a regular. I'd be much more worried if we sold Howson. (n/m) (NCFC) - avenging canary, May 31, 19:24:14
- Don't be - wages!! (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, May 31, 19:15:49
  - We have one year of parachute payments left. If we are going to (NCFC) - Jim, May 31, 19:20:56
    - so we should keep some players because they are big earners, ergo they must be good... (NCFC) - Tombs, May 31, 19:43:42
      - No we should keep some good players notwithstanding the fact that (NCFC) - Jim, May 31, 19:46:39
        
        sometimes the big time charlies can upset the balance of the team (NCFC) - Tombs, May 31, 19:54:25
    - Not if we upgrade (n/m) (NCFC) - Gob on a Stick, May 31, 19:29:13
    - We will have saved about that from the 7 released already! (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, May 31, 19:24:37
      - Think we will see plenty out the door .. (NCFC) - loz, May 31, 19:27:10
        
        I think it's a huge risk to assume they can be replaced by players on much lower wages (NCFC) - Jim, May 31, 19:44:57
      - Sorry that was a reply to Loz below (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, May 31, 19:26:06
    - Don't forget parachute payments are 12m less this year (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, May 31, 19:22:37

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.