Lambert and Neil were good appointments. I give Mcnally credit for them. But
You then slightly undo all the good work when you get a promising manager like Neil and you don;t back him with the players he needs to give us the best chance of survival. And the really frustrating thing is that its not like we needed 5 or 6 players, maybe just one decent CB would have been enough (although ideally a RB as well). We appear to have shot ourselves in the foot for the sake of saving what by premier league standards is not huge money.
Real mixed bag our board. They get some things very right and Michael, Delia and Foulger are good people but when the chips are down or it comes to the crunch decisions that make the difference between staying up and going down we just seem to lose the plot a bit or play it safe rather than take a bit of a risk with an eye on long term gain.
Posted By: Jim on October 27th 2015 at 10:59:03
Message Thread
- Do we give the board some credit? (NCFC) - hoolahan, Oct 27, 10:28:20
- The Board get a lot of credit and criticism in equal and fair measure in my opinion (NCFC) - Chalk Hill Bitter, Oct 27, 11:37:09
- Really like this, good post. (n/m) (NCFC) - megson, Oct 27, 12:45:23
- Nicely put (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Oct 27, 12:39:48
- Lennon has to sell players that are any good though (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Oct 27, 11:01:55
- so do most Championship teams (NCFC) - mr carra, Oct 27, 11:16:10
- I thought it was a mistake him going there........ (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Oct 27, 11:24:58
- no-one better seemed interested (NCFC) - mr carra, Oct 27, 11:33:55
- I thought it was a mistake him going there........ (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Oct 27, 11:24:58
- so do most Championship teams (NCFC) - mr carra, Oct 27, 11:16:10
- Lambert and Neil were good appointments. I give Mcnally credit for them. But (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 27, 10:59:03
- Hoots was here 2 years...... these days thats a lifetime. (NCFC) - usacanary, Oct 27, 11:23:56
- It was the wrong appointment stylistically (NCFC) - Brandonio, Oct 27, 12:53:15
- Very hard to argue we were in a better position than Swansea (NCFC) - mr carra, Oct 27, 13:20:15
- vmt - plus Swansea received about 40m that summer (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Oct 27, 13:35:09
- Very hard to argue we were in a better position than Swansea (NCFC) - mr carra, Oct 27, 13:20:15
- Hughton was a decent appointment at the time and post Lambert was what (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 27, 12:20:35
- It was the wrong appointment stylistically (NCFC) - Brandonio, Oct 27, 12:53:15
- 'you don;t back him with the players he needs to give us the best chance of survival' (NCFC) - Brom, Oct 27, 11:03:07
- Yes - because they didn't get their defensive targets, any of them (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 27, 12:22:30
- Because they were too ambitious (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 27, 11:45:22
- Zero, even Neil said himself the players didnt want to come. (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Oct 27, 11:22:11
- Hoots was here 2 years...... these days thats a lifetime. (NCFC) - usacanary, Oct 27, 11:23:56
- well theyre bound to occasionally get some things right but (NCFC) - pab, Oct 27, 10:44:46
- but they have corrected that since. (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Oct 27, 13:05:04
- "I understood McKay turned our offer down" (NCFC) - KentonCanary, Oct 27, 11:28:24
- they're also occasionally bound to get some things wrong (NCFC) - mr carra, Oct 27, 11:20:15
- exactly, we currently have zero debt and playing PL football. (NCFC) - usacanary, Oct 27, 11:26:36
- Good point, well made. (n/m) (NCFC) - MIKEWALKER, Oct 27, 11:08:34
- shit point, terribly made (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Oct 27, 11:25:46
- The Board get a lot of credit and criticism in equal and fair measure in my opinion (NCFC) - Chalk Hill Bitter, Oct 27, 11:37:09
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.