That's my take too. Could argue its harsh as he wold have been expecting a chest there

not Chico's head.
However as you say its clearly an attempt to strike him with his arm so.....
Ref could have got away with giving him a yellow I think but over turning the Red sort of says its ok to hit someone in the chest.

I think they'll uphold it, but then I expected BJ's to be upheld.

Posted By: megson on February 4th 2014 at 12:03:20

Message Thread

Hope Carroll's red card is upheld, cos with him they'll beat us next week IMO! (n/m) (NCFC) - Kirrie, Feb 4, 10:36:36
- They will be fuming if its not overturned. I personally (NCFC) - Jim, Feb 4, 10:46:39
  - That's my take too. Could argue its harsh as he wold have been expecting a chest there (NCFC) - megson, Feb 4, 12:03:20
    - Yeah, I definitely saw it as him intentionally swinging his body round to look accidental. (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Feb 4, 14:56:54
      - 100% deliberate (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 4, 15:06:00
- They will beat us regardless, we are woeful (n/m) (NCFC) - 51eve, Feb 4, 10:39:04
- theyll beat us without him its an away game (n/m) (NCFC) - matgore, Feb 4, 10:38:59
  - Give me a break guys, I'm clutching at starws here! (n/m) (NCFC) - Kirrie, Feb 4, 10:40:14
    - STRAWS even! (n/m) (NCFC) - Kirrie, Feb 4, 10:40:38

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.