Signed, but i do hope the focus on Littlejohn doesnt distract from criticism of
the broader, and greater problem: Littlejohn wasn't stationed outside Meadows' house or workplace. Those c**ts who were, and the editors who sent those c**ts, and any of us who condone their behaviour: we've as much blood on our hands as Littlejohn. The professionally mendacious c**t.
Posted By: Arizona Bay on March 24th 2013 at 17:26:12
Message Thread
- The most recent Littlejohn scandal was mentioned on here a few days ago (General Chat) - King, Mar 24, 16:07:13
- what he said (General Chat) - paulg, Mar 24, 17:35:51
- Yes. If I said unpleasant things in my job I would get sacked, as I suspect most (General Chat) - megson, Mar 24, 23:05:38
- vmt (n/m) (General Chat) - ghostof barry butler, Mar 24, 18:08:24
- Littlejohn is not a journalist. (n/m) (General Chat) - Arizona Bay, Mar 24, 17:46:07
- Signed, but i do hope the focus on Littlejohn doesnt distract from criticism of (General Chat) - Arizona Bay, Mar 24, 17:26:12
- signed (n/m) (General Chat) - colincanary, Mar 24, 17:03:06
- I didn't know. That's disgusting. Duly signed. (n/m) (General Chat) - Old Man, Mar 24, 16:56:58
- done (n/m) (General Chat) - emmaroyds, Mar 24, 16:46:14
- agreed, awful man, awful column and appalling unwarranted attack (General Chat) - Worzel Scrimmage, Mar 24, 16:32:58
- signed (n/m) (General Chat) - robert_rosario, Mar 24, 16:17:38
- what he said (General Chat) - paulg, Mar 24, 17:35:51
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.