Maybe, but then let's be honest, Culverhouse and Karsa will be going
Posted By: SimonOTBC on June 7th 2012 at 10:06:56
Message Thread
- Why are we paying ?2m for Hughton.... (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Jun 7, 10:02:39
- lambert was only on a one year rolling contract, Hughton is on a longer contract (n/m) (NCFC) - Tony Martin, Jun 7, 10:22:26
- No he isn't - he's also on a 12 month rolling contract (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Jun 7, 11:06:17
- Correct (NCFC) - Surrey Yella, Jun 7, 12:18:00
- No he isn't - he's also on a 12 month rolling contract (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Jun 7, 11:06:17
- Because Lambert is gone and if we want the Hoot we've gotta pay the loot. (NCFC) - Waddockhunt, Jun 7, 10:07:40
- This. We know nothing. Reporters are just making it up because they know (NCFC) - Old Man, Jun 7, 10:23:35
- i was going to ask that, i assume it's a clause in his contract? (n/m) (NCFC) - protheroe fitzgibbon, Jun 7, 10:06:19
- I wouldn't worry about it, unlikely we'll ever know true figures or why. (n/m) (NCFC) - megson, Jun 7, 10:05:24
- I'm assuming that it will basically all but net off for us i.e. Villa effectively pay Brum (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Jun 7, 10:10:50
- isn't the ?2m for him and all his backroom staff as well? (n/m) (NCFC) - d32by, Jun 7, 10:04:43
- Maybe, but then let's be honest, Culverhouse and Karsa will be going (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Jun 7, 10:06:56
- lambert was only on a one year rolling contract, Hughton is on a longer contract (n/m) (NCFC) - Tony Martin, Jun 7, 10:22:26
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.