Swansea have shown us how it should be done. ?3m plus and don't sign their players.
We're reportedly scrambling over ?1m or so....and reportedly losing our top scorer for 3 years to them.
Hate to say it - but looks like we've dropped one here.
Posted By: songwriter on June 3rd 2012 at 10:28:30
Message Thread
- Swansea have shown us how it should be done. ?3m plus and don't sign their players. (NCFC) - songwriter, Jun 3, 10:28:30
- Does really doesn't it? Hindsight etc. but should have let him talk with blessing. (NCFC) - megson, Jun 3, 12:01:55
- Doesn't change anything. If anything shows they're willing to splash 7m on players. (NCFC) - songwriter, Jun 3, 10:33:49
- The difference is Rogers had just signed a new long term contract (NCFC) - Duck, Jun 3, 10:31:54
- Why not put something in contract? You can talk to prem but ?3m and no player transfer (n/m) (NCFC) - songwriter, Jun 3, 10:35:43
- a contract can only ever include what both parties agree to (NCFC) - CWC, Jun 3, 11:02:51
- Why not put something in contract? You can talk to prem but ?3m and no player transfer (n/m) (NCFC) - songwriter, Jun 3, 10:35:43
- But wait for the megablub when GIYLF signs for Lolerpool (n/m) (NCFC) - Waddockhunt, Jun 3, 10:30:54
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.